[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY3+OnQ6Oo_nx+BrWebeTa=kYhHWSzirk1MxfWWJ--0Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:52:54 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>> > struct pinctrl_map *map,
>> > unsigned num_maps)
>> > {
>> > + unsigned long *pinconfig;
>>
>> This looks out of place and context?
>
> Yeah, sorry, it's just a leftover from the previous version. This has
> been removed.
Do you mean you will send a v3 of this series?
OK stopping to apply then.
But I have already applied patches 1, 2 and 3 so just resend the rest :)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists