[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020130202.GA473@swordfish>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:02:02 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] printk: Fix kdb_trap_printk placement
On (10/18/16 19:08), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Some people figured vprintk_emit() makes for a nice API and exported
> it, bypassing the kdb trap.
>
> This still leaves vprintk_nmi() outside of the kbd reach, should that
> be fixed too?
>
> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists