[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_0U-j6yrO0oOY99UqdVoSqqzN=2c3MbRV8wosWqhm_8EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:03:37 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Jagan Teki <jteki@...nedev.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Ezequiel García <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...gle.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for S3AN spi-nor devices
Ping?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
>>>
>>> Unsinged long is more than enough for s3an. I think v7 is ok.
>>
>> Then, why did you change the spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert() prototype?
>>
>
> Because it is used in spi_nor_read and spi_nor_write, which use loff_t.
>
> I think it is more clean to have only one comment explaining the max
> size of the s3an, instead of having them scattered around. But if
> think that it is better to have unsinged int as prototype I have no
> problem in changing it.
>
> Regards!
>
>
> --
> Ricardo Ribalda
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists