[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CF522109-3020-4E7D-A9F5-F7DFB61F9B65@darmarit.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:15:22 +0200
From: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The downside of math::
Am 20.10.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>:
>> So, I really prefer not removing math support.
>
> I wonder if we could cook up a nice way to make the math:: usage
> conditional on actually being able to render it.
>
> I would rather have the math:: directive produce just the preformatted
> indented block as-is in the html output, instead of failing, when latex
> is not available.
>
> Adapt to the environment, produce the prettiest thing when you can, but
> fallback to something uglier if all the dependencies are not there. See
> what I did with the sphinx_rtd_theme in conf.py - we use it if it's
> there, but it's not a hard dependency.
Hi Jani,
you are right. I will add this point to my TODO list. Give me just
a view days / ATM I'am working on a other project.
--Markus--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists