[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1012857651.1231744.1476978251733.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm/hugetlb: fix huge page reservation leak in
private mapping error paths
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Naoya Horiguchi" <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>, "Michal
> Hocko" <mhocko@...e.com>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, "Hillf Danton"
> <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@...hat.com>, "Mike
> Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 20 October, 2016 5:11:16 AM
> Subject: [PATCH 0/1] mm/hugetlb: fix huge page reservation leak in private mapping error paths
>
> This issue was discovered by Jan Stancek as described in
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/57FF7BB4.1070202@redhat.com
>
> Error paths in hugetlb_cow() and hugetlb_no_page() do not properly clean
> up reservation entries when freeing a newly allocated huge page. This
> issue was introduced with commit 67961f9db8c4 ("mm/hugetlb: fix huge page
> reserve accounting for private mappings). That commit uses the information
> in private mapping reserve maps to determine if a reservation was already
> consumed. This is important in the case of hole punch and truncate as the
> pages are released, but reservation entries are not restored.
>
> This patch restores the reserve entries in hugetlb_cow and hugetlb_no_page
> such that reserve entries are consistent with the global reservation count.
>
> The huge page reservation code is quite hard to follow, and this patch
> makes it even more complex. One thought I had was to change the way
> hole punch and truncate work so that private mapping pages are not thrown
> away. This would eliminate the need for this patch as well as 67961f9db8c4.
> It would change the existing semantics (as seen by the user) in this area,
> but I believe the documentation (man pages) say the behavior is unspecified.
> This could be a future change as well as rewriting the existing reservation
> code to make it easier to understand/maintain. Thoughts?
>
> In any case, this patch addresses the immediate issue.
Mike,
Just to confirm, I ran this patch on my setup (without the patch from Aneesh)
with libhugetlbfs testsuite in loop for several hours. There were no
ENOMEM/OOM failures, I did not observe resv leak after it finished.
Regards,
Jan
>
> Mike Kravetz (1):
> mm/hugetlb: fix huge page reservation leak in private mapping error
> paths
>
> mm/hugetlb.c | 66
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists