[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e6e123e-4bb8-951c-9d49-4cb5480c37fd@st.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:05:15 +0200
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<ludovic.barre@...com>, <olivier.bideau@...com>,
<amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
Hi Stephen,
On 10/19/2016 10:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
>> @@ -292,8 +298,110 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
>> return clks[i];
>> }
>>
>> +static struct regmap *pdrm;
> This can't be part of the stm32_rgate structure?
Finally i prefer not, because i need also to disable power domain write
protection in the patch 4 (clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock).
its will complicate the code.
BR
Gabriel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists