[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACbG309gmrJcK+Q2CjhWXBCvJh3yVOsYrc3ZsC4py36BhOcZVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:41:11 -0500
From: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch
counting in callchain
On 19 October 2016 at 17:01, Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.h b/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
> index 40ecf25..4f6bf6c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,10 @@ struct callchain_list {
> bool unfolded;
> bool has_children;
> };
> + u64 branch_count;
> + u64 predicted_count;
> + u64 abort_count;
Can you explain what abort count is? It seems you are referring to
miss-speculated branches. If that is the case, I would prefer that we
replace abort by miss_speculated or miss_predicted.
--
Nilay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists