[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020170438.GA13724@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:04:39 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Leon Yu <chianglungyu@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Janis Danisevskis <jdanis@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc: fix NULL dereference when reading
/proc/<pid>/auxv
On 10/20, Leon Yu wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1014,6 +1014,9 @@ static ssize_t auxv_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data;
> unsigned int nwords = 0;
> +
> + if (!mm)
> + return 0;
> do {
> nwords += 2;
> } while (mm->saved_auxv[nwords - 2] != 0); /* AT_NULL */
Michal disagrees and I won't argue with his patch which makes __mem_open()
fail if ->mm == NULL. Even if I don't really understand why should we change
the old behaviour, this _can_ break or at least confuse something/someone.
However, even if we do the change above, personally I do think we should
fix the trivial bug first, then surprise the user-space.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists