[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020182913.GS19318@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:29:13 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] J-Core timer support
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:56:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:32:40AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Unfortunately it won't happen. v4.9-rc1 is already out. The driver will be
> > > in v4.10.
> > >
> > > If you wanted patches merged for v4.9, they should have been merged in the
> > > downstream tree before v4.8-rc5, so they hit the upstream tree for v4.9's merge
> > > window.
> >
> > I've been trying to get what's essentially the same patch merged since
> > before the 4.8 merge window. I would be more understanding if this
> > were something new that's not upstream, but broken support for the
> > hardware (that, from a user perspective, is a bug, since they can
> > select the target but then it doesn't boot) has already been in one
> > release due to missing core drivers, and the irq patches have already
> > been merged in this release (post-rc1 even).
>
> It's hardware enablement and not a new feature, so it's fine to merge it
> now. I'll pick it up later tonight.
Thanks Thomas. Daniel, sorry if my above reply was harsh and thanks
again for all your help reviewing and getting this upstream.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists