[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaCZPS45t3eTcjJExOu=YT_YkjNkdpg09jQqvLQOJH=Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:21:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] pinctrl: meson: allow gpio to request irq
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> wrote:
> Add the ability for gpio to request irq from the gpio interrupt controller
> if present. We have to specificaly that the parent interrupt controller is
> the gpio interrupt controller because gpio on meson SoCs can't generate
> interrupt directly on the GIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
(...)
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select OF_GPIO
> + select OF_IRQ
(...)
> +static int meson_gpio_to_hwirq(struct meson_bank *bank, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + unsigned int hwirq;
> +
> + if (bank->irq_first < 0)
> + /* this bank cannot generate irqs */
> + return -1;
> +
> + hwirq = offset - bank->first + bank->irq_first;
> +
> + if (hwirq > bank->irq_last)
> + /* this pin cannot generate irqs */
> + return -1;
> +
> + return hwirq;
> +}
This is reimplementing irqdomain.
> +static int meson_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
(...)
> + hwirq = meson_gpio_to_hwirq(bank, offset);
> + if (hwirq < 0) {
> + dev_dbg(pc->dev, "no interrupt for pin %u\n", offset);
> + return 0;
> + }
Isn't this usecase (also as described in the cover letter) a textbook
example of when you should be using hierarchical irqdomain?
Please check with Marc et al on hierarchical irqdomains.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists