[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1817842.78IB8nV8t8@sifl>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:27:36 -0400
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sgrubb@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] Add support for session ID user filtering
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 01:43:12 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Session-ID-User-Filter
> RFE Session ID User Filter
>
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/4
> RFE: add a session ID filter to the kernel's user filter
>
> See also the set of userspace suport patches:
> Add support for sessionid user filters, sessionid_set and loginuid_set
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2016-August/msg00005.html
> (userspace update expected to be posted 2016-08-18)
> and the test case:
> https://github.com/rgbriggs/audit-testsuite/tree/ghak4-test-for-sessionID-u
> ser-filter
>
> This third patch is expected to have a merge conflict with:
> "audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap"
> posted on 2016-08-18.
>
> Richard Guy Briggs (3):
> audit: add support for session ID user filter
> audit: add AUDIT_SESSIONID_SET support
> audit: add sessionid filter extension to feature bitmap
>
> include/linux/audit.h | 10 ++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 6 +++++-
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 5 +++++
> kernel/auditsc.c | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
In light of our current decision to drop the session ID "set" filter, I'm
taking another look at these patches and Richard's comment to simply drop
patch 2/3 and apply 1/3 and 3/3.
Richard, as I mentioned earlier, perhaps not clearly enough, I think we should
put a check in audit_set_loginuid() to skip the (int)-1 value from appearing
in session_id during normal operation. In other words, roll/reset the value
in session_id one value early so we don't run into problems with the (int)-1
unset sentinel value.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists