[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476998369.10048.1@x201s.roaming.asbjorn.biz>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:19:29 +0000
From: Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen <asbjorn@...jorn.st>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: R Parameswaran <parameswaran.r7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: l2tp_eth: fix max_mtu
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:08:26 +0000 (UTC), ast@...jorn.biz wrote:
> diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.c
> index 965f7e3..ba82dcc 100644
> --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.c
> +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static int l2tp_eth_create(struct net *net, u32 tunnel_id, u32 session_id, u32 p
> session->mtu = dev->mtu - session->hdr_len;
> dev->mtu = session->mtu;
> dev->needed_headroom += session->hdr_len;
> + dev->max_mtu = ETH_MAX_MTU - dev->needed_headroom;
I forgot to add that subtracting dev->needed_headroom doesn't
give the exact maximum MTU, but one that is a bit too high.
It could also just be set to ETH_MAX_MTU, to indicate that
the encapsulation is not included.
Calculations like in R. Parameswaran's patch is needed for the
exact one.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/17/3
--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists