linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:37:55 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        黄涛 <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
        Tony Xie <tony.xie@...k-chips.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Akihiro Tsukada <tskd08@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> Please wait for a full review and do not send out patches 5 seconds after
> the first mail hits your inbox.

Since you had previously commented on patch 1 and had already
commented on patch 2, I presumed you were done reviewing, but I was
obviously in error.  My apologies.

-Doug