[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161021054050.GX3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:40:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
will.deacon@....com, kernellwp@...il.com, jgross@...e.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, bsingharora@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:27:45PM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
Thanks, this looks very good. I'll wait for ACKs from at least the KVM
people, since that was I think the most contentious patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists