lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161021075142.GS4469@mwanda>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:51:43 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] FRV-setup: Fix indentation in two lines

I don't think changing check_patch.pl or CodingStyle will help...

I've banned Markus from sending cleanups in parts of the kernel where I
have a voice (drivers/staging).  Bugfixes are welcome, but cleanups are
not.  I've done this before for other people who introduce a bunch of
bugs in clean up patches.

It's all about ratios...  Each clean up patch has chance of introducing
a bug.  If you only send clean up patches then you only introduce bugs.
We really don't want people sending patches if they introduce more bugs
than they fix.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ