[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6a0f61e-9d78-3df1-8e41-435eb47a1f00@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:25:14 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-drm <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: bus: da8xx-syscfg: new driver
On 20/10/16 22:39, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> However, after our discussion on IRC, we'll respin this without the DT
> bindings at all. Next version will just use static configuration data
> in the drivers/bus driver based on SoC compatible string, since for the
> use-cases I'm aware of, the settings are boot-time only.
If it's static boot time config, why not do it in the u-boot?
I'm fine either way, but this sounds like quite low level memory bus config.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists