[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02b2126b-0348-0b9e-ac91-79fa18657971@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:56:13 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-drm <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: bus: da8xx-syscfg: new driver
On 21/10/16 12:53, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Friday 21 October 2016 02:55 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 20/10/16 22:39, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>>> However, after our discussion on IRC, we'll respin this without the DT
>>> bindings at all. Next version will just use static configuration data
>>> in the drivers/bus driver based on SoC compatible string, since for the
>>> use-cases I'm aware of, the settings are boot-time only.
>>
>> If it's static boot time config, why not do it in the u-boot?
>
> Hardware initialization dependencies with boot-loader are tough to track
> and debug. The bootloader thats currently ships with the board may not
> have these settings, for example. This forces everyone to update their
> bootloader when shifting to mainline kernel.
Yep, true... We need something similar for AM335x too. And perhaps for
other SoCs too (AM4 comes to my mind).
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists