linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 5/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:14:01 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     fu.wei@...aro.org
Cc:     linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, rruigrok@...eaurora.org, wim@...ana.be,
        wei@...hat.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, al.stone@...aro.org,
        tn@...ihalf.com, timur@...eaurora.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        harba@...eaurora.org, julien.grall@....com,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        marc.zyngier@....com, jcm@...hat.com, cov@...eaurora.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        graeme.gregory@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, leo.duran@....com,
        hanjun.guo@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
        sudeep.holla@....com, christoffer.dall@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 5/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Simplify
 ACPI support code.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:58:17PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:13AM +0800, fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
> > +	arch_timer_ppi[PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI);
> > +	arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(VIRT_PPI);
> > +	arch_timer_ppi[HYP_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(HYP_PPI);
> > +	/* Always-on capability */
> > +	arch_timer_c3stop = acpi_gtdt_c3stop();
> 
> ... I think we should check the flag on the relevant interrupt, though
> that's worth clarifying.

I see I misread the spec; this is part of the common flags.

Please ignore this point; sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Mark.