[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1477051138-1610-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:58:56 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] s390: make cpu_relax a barrier again
stop_machine seems to be the only important place for yielding during
cpu_relax. This was fixed by using cpu_relax_yield. Therefore, we can
now redefine cpu_relax to be a barrier instead. (With the option to do
some SMT tuning later on)
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
index d05965b..5d262cf 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline unsigned short stap(void)
*/
void cpu_relax_yield(void);
-#define cpu_relax() cpu_relax_yield()
+#define cpu_relax() barrier()
#define cpu_relax_lowlatency() barrier()
#define ECAG_CACHE_ATTRIBUTE 0
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists