[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477053400.22861.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:36:40 -0400
From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>
To: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: gpiolib-of: Cannot request gpio with multiple chips
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 17:22 +0200, Axel Haslam wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> I have recently started testing a omap-lcdk board which uses the
> davinci gpio driver,
> and im running into an issue when i try to request a gpio larger than 31, which
> i think might be a regression of gpiolib-of.
>
> The davinci gpio driver, creates several chips, and relies in a single DT node.
> in other words, davinci gpio chips have a single DT entry were ngpio = 144
> but the driver internally creates multiple chips of ngpio = 32.
>
> It used to be that gpiolib-of would iterate through all gpio chips
> calling xlate until
> xlate would match for the chip that can handle a particular gpio number.
>
> Starting form a series sent on june:
> "gpio: refactor of_parse_own_gpio() and of_get_named_gpiod_flags()"
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/14/188
>
> patches:
> 99468c1 gpio: of: factor out common code to a new helper function
> 762c2e4 gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data
> 1020dfd gpio: of: move chip->of_gpio_n_cells checking to of_gpiochip_add()
> be71534 gpio: of: drop needless gpio_chip look-up in of_parse_own_gpio()
> 3f9547e gpio: of: optimize "gpios" property parsing of of_parse_own_gpio()
>
>
> The gpiolib-of will fail at of_get_named_gpiod_flags the first time if the xlate
> function returns error. Which means that only the first gpio chip will be tried.
> For the davinci dirver, for example, we are not able to use any gpio outside of
> the first gpio chip (32 gpios).
>
> if you agree with the above, What is the best way to proceed ?
> - fix the davinci gpio driver to the new behavior of gpiolib-of
> - fix the gpiolib-of to loop all chips again?
> - revert the patches?
>
Other GPIO drivers are also affected.
This was reported for the LPC32xx platform on Tuesday:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg17283.html
> Regards
> Axel.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sylvain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists