lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jSqucMXyM7d9K2V0XA_i3kX=cF8ir-41bLgJYKJ27UGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:47:22 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: governors: Move the files to the upper directory

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> Currently the different governors are stored in the subdir
> 'governors'. That is not a problem.
>
> However, that forces to declare some private structure in the
> include/linux/cpuidle.h header because these governor files
> don't have access to the private 'cpuidle.h' located in
> drivers/cpuidle.
>
> Instead of having the governors in the separate directory, move
> them along with the drivers and prefix them with 'governor-',
> that allows to do a proper cleanup in the cpuidle headers.

While I'm not particularly against this change, I'm sort of wondering
about the reason.

What in particular would be wrong with doing

#include "../cpuidle.h"

in a governor .c file?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ