linux-kernel - [PATCH 21/26] ubifs: Rename tnc_read_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:48:36 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        dedekind1@...il.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, tytso@....edu,
        jaegeuk@...nel.org, david@...ma-star.at, wd@...x.de,
        sbabic@...x.de, dengler@...utronix.de,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH 21/26] ubifs: Rename tnc_read_node_nm

tnc_read_hashed_node() is a better name since we read a node
by a given hash, not a name.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
---
 fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/tnc.c b/fs/ubifs/tnc.c
index 0d0030461cb4..0d751297873e 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/tnc.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/tnc.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void lnc_free(struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr)
 }
 
 /**
- * tnc_read_node_nm - read a "hashed" leaf node.
+ * tnc_read_hashed_node - read a "hashed" leaf node.
  * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
  * @zbr: key and position of the node
  * @node: node is returned here
@@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ static void lnc_free(struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr)
  * added to LNC. Returns zero in case of success or a negative negative error
  * code in case of failure.
  */
-static int tnc_read_node_nm(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr,
-			    void *node)
+static int tnc_read_hashed_node(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr,
+				void *node)
 {
 	int err;
 
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ again:
 		 * In this case the leaf node cache gets used, so we pass the
 		 * address of the zbranch and keep the mutex locked
 		 */
-		err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, zt, node);
+		err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, zt, node);
 		goto out;
 	}
 	if (safely) {
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ static int do_lookup_nm(struct ubifs_info *c, const union ubifs_key *key,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, &znode->zbranch[n], node);
+	err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, &znode->zbranch[n], node);
 
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&c->tnc_mutex);
@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ struct ubifs_dent_node *ubifs_tnc_next_ent(struct ubifs_info *c,
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, zbr, dent);
+	err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, zbr, dent);
 	if (unlikely(err))
 		goto out_free;
 
-- 
2.7.3