[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwP1H7V0cCvwdok-oc3J3nY2HLHuWK_jnjqLUBpoX8OJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:38:44 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: LAPIC: add APIC Timer periodic/oneshot mode VMX
preemption timer support
2016-10-21 2:10 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>:
> 2016-10-20 06:57+0800, Wanpeng Li:
>> 2016-10-20 3:28 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>:
>>> I think it would be better to add a function to advance the periodic
>>> timer and use it in kvm_lapic_expired_hv_timer() and in apic_timer_fn().
>>>
>>> The function can be simpler than set_target_expiration(), because it
>>> just adds the period to an existing timer. Periodic timer will also be
>>> better then, because the period will not depend on KVM's latency when
>>> rearming.
>>
>> Good point, what's the function name do you like? How about
>> advance_target_expiration()?
>
> Sounds good, I'd just slap periodic somewhere,
> advance_periodic_target_expiration()?
Cool, thanks for your review. :)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists