[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477062519.31557.2.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:08:39 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set P-state upfront in
performance mode
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 02:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> After commit a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with
> utilization update callbacks) the cpufreq governor callbacks may not
> be invoked on NOHZ_FULL CPUs and, in particular, switching to the
> "performance" policy via sysfs may not have any effect on them. That
> is a problem, because it usually is desirable to squeeze the last
> bit of performance out of those CPUs, so work around it by setting
> the maximum P-state (within the limits) in intel_pstate_set_policy()
> upfront when the policy is CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE.
>
> Fixes: a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with
> utilization update callbacks)
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1137,10 +1137,8 @@ static void intel_pstate_get_min_max(str
> *min = clamp_t(int, min_perf, cpu->pstate.min_pstate,
> max_perf);
> }
>
> -static void intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
> +static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate)
> {
> - int pstate = cpu->pstate.min_pstate;
> -
> trace_cpu_frequency(pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling, cpu->cpu);
> cpu->pstate.current_pstate = pstate;
> /*
> @@ -1152,6 +1150,20 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(
> pstate_funcs.get_val(cpu, pstate));
> }
>
> +static void intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
> +{
> + intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.min_pstate);
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_pstate_max_within_limits(struct cpudata *cpu)
> +{
> + int min_pstate, max_pstate;
> +
> + update_turbo_state();
> + intel_pstate_get_min_max(cpu, &min_pstate, &max_pstate);
> + intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, max_pstate);
> +}
> +
> static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
> {
> cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
> @@ -1485,7 +1497,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
> pr_debug("set_policy cpuinfo.max %u policy->max %u\n",
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, policy->max);
>
> - cpu = all_cpu_data[0];
> + cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
> if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate
> &&
> policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
> policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling) {
> @@ -1529,6 +1541,15 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
> limits->max_perf = round_up(limits->max_perf, FRAC_BITS);
>
> out:
> + if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
> + /*
> + * NOHZ_FULL CPUs need this as the governor callback
> may not
> + * be invoked on them.
> + */
> + intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
> + intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
> + }
> +
> intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
>
> intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists