linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf15034c-3750-bb57-fdc3-79b87bbe986d@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:54:30 -0500
From:   Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI

On 10/21/2016 12:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org> wrote:
>> This has been in linux-next for a month or so.
> Clearly not. It was committed yesterday.
>
> What the hell is wrong with people? If you had it in linux-next and it
> was tested, why did you then send me something else?

I rebased it, but that was it.  I'll resend the exact version that was 
in linux-next.

-corey

> Pulled and then immediately unpulled again, because the "this was
> ready but I didn't send it to you because I was on vacation" was a
> fine explanation, but then when I actually look at it I notice that it
> wasn't actually true.
>
>                        Linus