[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161021182559.GB90712@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:25:59 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dedekind1@...il.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, tytso@....edu, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
david@...ma-star.at, wd@...x.de, sbabic@...x.de,
dengler@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] ubifs: Implement encrypt/decrypt for all IO
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:48:30PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> +
> + if (ubifs_crypt_is_encrypted(inode)) {
> + int clen = le16_to_cpu(dn->compr_size);
> +
> + if (clen <= 0 || clen > UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE || clen > dlen)
> + goto dump;
> +
> + ubifs_assert(dlen <= UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + err = fscrypt_decrypt_buffer(inode, &dn->data, &dn->data, dlen, block, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (err) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "fscrypt_decrypt_buffer failed: %i", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + ubifs_assert(clen <= dlen);
> + dlen = clen;
> + }
> +
There are several code blocks like this, calling either fscrypt_decrypt_buffer()
or fscrypt_encrypt_buffer(), which seem to be mostly duplicated. Is it possible
to refactor them into helper functions? There are also some lines well over 80
characters.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists