linux-kernel - Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:50:11 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in
 show_cpuinfo()

> When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down,

The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow.
Different software development opinions occur then as usual.
Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations
between disagreement and acceptance.

> and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches,

I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries.

> we have a really big problem.

I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved.

> Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs.

I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they?

Regards,
Markus