[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161021202325.q6uh7k2pgnv276rg@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:23:25 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bio linked list corruption.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:17:48PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 130654 off 0 csum 2566472073 expected csum 3008371513
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131057 off 4096 csum 3563910319 expected csum 738595262
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131176 off 4096 csum 1344477721 expected csum 441864825
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131241 off 245760 csum 3576232181 expected csum 2566472073
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131429 off 0 csum 1494450239 expected csum 2646577722
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 0 csum 3949539320 expected csum 3828807800
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 4096 csum 3475108475 expected csum 2566472073
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 958464 csum 142982740 expected csum 2566472073
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 0 csum 3949539320 expected csum 3828807800
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131532 off 270336 csum 3138898528 expected csum 2566472073
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131532 off 1249280 csum 2169165042 expected csum 2566472073
> > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131649 off 16384 csum 2914965650 expected csum 1425742005
> >
> >
> > A curious thing: the expected csum 2566472073 turns up a number of times for different inodes, and gets
> > differing actual csums each time. I suppose this could be something like a block of all zeros in multiple files,
> > but it struck me as surprising.
> >
> > btrfs people: is there an easy way to map those inodes to a filename ? I'm betting those are the
> > test files that trinity generates. If so, it might point to a race somewhere.
>
> btrfs inspect inode 130654 mntpoint
Interesting, they all return
ERROR: ino paths ioctl: No such file or directory
So these files got deleted perhaps ?
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists