linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix and update HOWTO Korean translation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161021144745.18e2e93c@lwn.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:47:45 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Cc:     minchan@...nel.org, mchehab@...pensource.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix and update HOWTO Korean translation

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 00:19:45 +0900
SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com> wrote:

> This patchset applies ReST conversion effort for HOWTO document to its Korean
> translation.  It also contains fixup of trivial nitpicks in the document and
> the translation.

Thanks for doing these; let's definitely get this work in soon.  I have
just a few comments:

- I think that bringing the (English) HOWTO into line with our posted
  conventions makes sense, I'm happy to take patches to do that.  Let's
  do that separately from the translation changes, though, and let's
  think in terms of building on Mauro's work.  Either send me a patch
  after his stuff is in, or send one for him to collect and send with the
  rest, whatever works best for everybody else.

- You do the ReST conversion, but don't take the final step and actually
  bring the document into the Sphinx world.

I've been thinking that it would be good to make a translations/
top-level directory and move the various translated documents underneath
that.  Then we could maybe make a translations/index.rst and create a
special subbook for those documents.  Make sense?

If at all possible, I'd like an ack from somebody else who understands
Korean.  Minchan, I see you on the CC, can you help out? :)  With that, I
see no reason not to apply parts 2-12.

Thanks,

jon