[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1390356-5b8a-9b8f-e426-ad820b484af1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:08:59 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com,
Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com>,
mhocko@...nel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes"
On 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below?
>
> There was only one AFAICT?
>
>>> Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to
>>> "thread" okay then?
>
>>>From what I see yes.
>
>
Thanks, Christoph. I've added a Reviewed-by from you.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists