lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:14:49 +0800 From: Xiaolong Zhang <xiaolong.zhang@...eadtrum.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> CC: <mturquette@...libre.com>, <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>, <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ben.li@...eadturm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Register clkdev after setup of fixed-rate and fixed-factor clocks On ε, 10ζ 20, 2016 at 04:01:03δΈε -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/11, Orson Zhai wrote: > > From: Xiaolong Zhang <xiaolong.zhang@...eadtrum.com> > > > > When common kernel setups fixed clock, of_clk_provider will be registerred. > > But there is no clkdev being registerred at the same time. This will make > > it difficult to get the clock by using clk_get(NULL, con_id). > > > > Add clkdev register for fixed-rate and fixed-factor clock and ignore > > the error if any. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Zhang <xiaolong.zhang@...eadtrum.com> > > Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com> > > --- > > Why are we using clkdev lookups for clks populated from DT? > Shouldn't we be able to point to them from the consumers that > would also be in DT? I'm a little lost. > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project The clk_get interface allows the first argument as NULL. We just assure consumers can get the clock from DT or by clock name.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists