linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/AMD: Apply erratum 688 on machines without a BIOS fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161023172530.buklz6ir56dmbvu7@pd.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:25:30 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     sonofagun@...nmailbox.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nikos Barkas <levelwol@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/AMD: Apply erratum 688 on machines without a BIOS fix

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:06:44PM +0300, sonofagun@...nmailbox.org wrote:
> I use the patchwork site and my brother uses an LKML mirror site. He gets
> patches from there. This worked the with the first two patches but the last
> one was a big one and that site truncated some bytes from a line...Sorry for
> the trouble.

You can simply save the email text if your mail client doesn't mangle
white space. Alternatively, there's

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/

which people do use.

> Kernel is now ready and moved to USB stick. Testing is about to begin. If
> everything works as expected I shall send V2 late at night! Thanks!!

Good.

But you don't need to send v2 - you just need to say whether my version
fixes it for you or not. If not, then I need to stare at it more. :)

In any case, I tested it on my ON-B0 box and it looked good.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.