lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyeAyOQiJFGNxiM8u+5T-8DnzRv4K8CkBxAZBij0mLpEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:13:29 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: linux.git: printk() problem

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps it could be a pool of active thread
> continuation buffers.

Yes, we could probably do with just a couple of entries. Even just two
would probably catch almost all cases.

That said, having dealt with that code, I'd hate to make it more
complex again for something where the preferred solution is "don't do
it".

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ