[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8126928.lSNgbyj5lv@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:58:25 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:47:29 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
>
> between commits:
>
> eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains")
> f9d1f7a7ad91 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Fix the imx_gpc_genpd_init() error path")
>
> from the imx-mxs tree and commit:
>
> 59d65b73a23c ("PM / Domains: Make genpd state allocation dynamic")
>
> from the pm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks Stephen!
Lina, please have a look at the Stephen's fix and let me know if that
conflict should be resolved in a different way.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists