[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <63c024b9-8662-e521-62e0-e0ebe980b217@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:18:45 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Hendrik Brückner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable
On 10/14/2016 10:21 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Steffen" == Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> Steffen> could you please queue this as fix for one of my patches that
> Steffen> went into the 4.9 merge window, so for 4.9-rc I guess?
>
> Applied to 4.9/scsi-fixes.
>
FWIW, I do see rcu stall errors with 4.9-rc1 from time to time, so I assume
that this fix is not only theoretical but fixes a real life issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists