[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024112945.GI3157@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:29:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Ni, BaoleX" <baolex.ni@...el.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:27:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:15:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > How about the trivial fix below?
> >
> > Oleg.
> >
> > --- x/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ x/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static u32 perf_event_pid(struct perf_ev
> > if (event->parent)
> > event = event->parent;
> >
> > - return task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns);
> > + return pid_alive(p) ? task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns) : 0;
> > }
>
> Also, now we get a (few) sample(s) with a different pid:tid than prior
> samples and not matching the sched_switch() events.
>
> I can imagine that being somewhat confusing for people/tools.
>
> Acme/Jolsa, any idea if that will bugger perf-report?
Hurm, then again, I imagine that after unhash_process the PID/TID could
be instantly re-used and then we're still confused.
Yuck.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists