linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: irq: fix build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161024223231.5cdbb2ac@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:32:31 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marcin Niestroj <m.niestroj@...nn-global.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: irq: fix build failure

Hi Lee,

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:22:15 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:  
> > > > I know. This is under discussion with the driver folks as we are not going
> > > > to blindly export stuff just because someone slapped a irq_set_parent()
> > > > into the code w/o knowing why.  
> > > 
> > > Do we have any idea if a resolution is close.  This was first reported
> > > in linux-next in September 14/15.  :-(  
> > 
> > Grr. Yes. As much as I hate it, I'll go and export it for now. Should be
> > able to get it into rc2.  
> 
> Did this get in?  I still have people complaining about it.

It is in -rc2.  Commit 3118dac501bc.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell