linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re: [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'le16')

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161024022915.kquynlfyup2dvyrq@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:29:15 +0800
From:   Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re:
 [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
 before 'le16')

Hi Pavel,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:37:12PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>On Mon 2016-10-03 21:52:38, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >>tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
>> >>head:   596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
>> >>commit: 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de [1/1] hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores
>> >>config: openrisc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> >>compiler: or32-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.1-or32-1.0rc1
>> >>reproduce:
>> >>        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> >>        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> >>        git checkout 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
>> >>        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> >>        make.cross ARCH=openrisc
>> >>
>> >>All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> >
>> >I get it, it does not compile anywhere, because I made a mistake. Ok?
>> >
>> >But I know now, and if it does not compile on x86, there's very very
>> >little chance that it would compile on openrisc.
>> >
>> >Can we stop the announcements after first or second failure?
>>
>> Sorry for the extra noises!
>>
>> The build bot will stop complaining after 3 reports on the same
>> commit. Shall I further reduce the threshold to 1 or 2? It'll risk
>> hiding real different/independent errors though.
>
>I'd reduce the threshold to 2. When I got third report, I thought "hmm
>and now I'm going to get 500 more.".

OK, reduced the threshold to 2. FYI we'll send another private report
hours later to summarize the various kind of errors if that threshold
is triggered.

Thanks,
Fengguang