linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/3] Coccinelle: misc: Improve the matching of rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <53a9e7344bd2fe5756c245ab0e1646976c1e0fbd.1477293469.git.vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:49:59 +0530
From:   Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
To:     mmarek@...e.com
Cc:     julia.lawall@...6.fr, gilles.muller@...6.fr, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
        cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lars@...afoo.de, Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] Coccinelle: misc: Improve the matching of rules

Currently because of the left associativity of the operators, pattern
IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the pattern when we have more
than one flag after the disjunction. This eventually results in giving
false positives by the script. This patch eliminates these FPs by
improving the rule.

Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
---
Changes since v2:
	- No change in this patch
Changes since v1:
	- Splitted patch in the patchset
---
 scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
index b421150..a8537fb 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
@@ -18,13 +18,12 @@ virtual report
 expression dev;
 expression irq;
 expression thread_fn;
-expression flags;
 position p;
 @@
 (
 request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, thread_fn,
 (
-flags | IRQF_ONESHOT
+IRQF_ONESHOT | ...
 |
 IRQF_ONESHOT
 )
@@ -32,20 +31,39 @@ IRQF_ONESHOT
 |
 devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, thread_fn,
 (
-flags | IRQF_ONESHOT
+IRQF_ONESHOT | ...
 |
 IRQF_ONESHOT
 )
 , ...)
 )
 
-@...ends on patch@
+@r2@
 expression dev;
 expression irq;
 expression thread_fn;
 expression flags;
+expression ret;
 position p != r1.p;
 @@
+flags = IRQF_ONESHOT | ...;
+(
+ret = request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, thread_fn, flags, ...);
+|
+ret = devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, thread_fn, flags, ...);
+|
+return request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, thread_fn, flags, ...);
+|
+return devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, thread_fn, flags, ...);
+)
+
+@...ends on patch@
+expression dev;
+expression irq;
+expression thread_fn;
+expression flags;
+position p != {r1.p,r2.p};
+@@
 (
 request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, thread_fn,
 (
@@ -69,13 +87,13 @@ devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, thread_fn,
 )
 
 @depends on context@
-position p != r1.p;
+position p != {r1.p,r2.p};
 @@
 *request_threaded_irq@p(...)
 
 @match depends on report || org@
 expression irq;
-position p != r1.p;
+position p != {r1.p,r2.p};
 @@
 request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, ...)
 
-- 
2.1.4