[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <580D759D.4000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:44:45 +0800
From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org"
<xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kernellwp@...il.com" <kernellwp@...il.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted
check
On 2016年10月21日 19:27, David Laight wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>> Sent: 20 October 2016 22:28
>> Commit ("x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check") add one field "__u8
>> preempted" into struct kvm_steal_time. This field tells if one vcpu is
>> running or not.
>>
>> It is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed. 2) the vcpu is
>> preempted. Other values means the vcpu has been preempted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>> index 2a71c8f..3376f13 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>> @@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME: 0x4b564d03
>> __u64 steal;
>> __u32 version;
>> __u32 flags;
>> - __u32 pad[12];
>> + __u8 preempted;
>> + __u32 pad[11];
>> }
>
> I think I'd be explicit about the 3 pad bytes you've left.
>
yes,I will do it in next version.
thanks
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists