[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477314612.3927.11.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:15:25 +0000
From: "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@...el.com>
To: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] tools/power turbostat: Use Intel family
processor macros
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 13:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Piotr Luc wrote:
> >
> > + case INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE: /* SNB */
>
> Especialy those, which are completely useless?
>
> The defines are there to be self explaining and the extra verbose
> information should be in the header file defining the macros and not
> in the
> source code.
Hi
I submitted the turbostat patchset
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161018210652.29365-1-piotr.luc@intel.com to
address the issues.
Regards
Piotr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists