lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024133127.e5evgeebdbohnmpb@treble>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:31:27 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/unwind: fix empty stack dereference in guess unwinder


Vince reported the following bug:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21338 at arch/x86/mm/fault.c:435 vmalloc_fault+0x58/0x1f0
  CPU: 0 PID: 21338 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 4.8.0+ #37
  Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF/1850, BIOS K06 v02.57 08/16/2013
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>  ? dump_stack+0x46/0x59
   ? __warn+0xd5/0xee
   ? vmalloc_fault+0x58/0x1f0
   ? __do_page_fault+0x6d/0x48e
   ? perf_log_throttle+0xa4/0xf4
   ? trace_page_fault+0x22/0x30
   ? __unwind_start+0x28/0x42
   ? perf_callchain_kernel+0x75/0xac
   ? get_perf_callchain+0x13a/0x1f0
   ? perf_callchain+0x6a/0x6c
   ? perf_prepare_sample+0x71/0x2eb
   ? perf_event_output_forward+0x1a/0x54
   ? __default_send_IPI_shortcut+0x10/0x2d
   ? __perf_event_overflow+0xfb/0x167
   ? x86_pmu_handle_irq+0x113/0x150
   ? native_read_msr+0x6/0x34
   ? perf_event_nmi_handler+0x22/0x39
   ? perf_ibs_nmi_handler+0x4a/0x51
   ? perf_event_nmi_handler+0x22/0x39
   ? nmi_handle+0x4d/0xf0
   ? perf_ibs_handle_irq+0x3d1/0x3d1
   ? default_do_nmi+0x3c/0xd5
   ? do_nmi+0x92/0x102
   ? end_repeat_nmi+0x1a/0x1e
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x12/0x4a
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x12/0x4a
   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x12/0x4a
   <EOE> ^A4---[ end trace 632723104d47d31a ]---
  BUG: stack guard page was hit at ffffc90008500000 (stack is ffffc900084fc000..ffffc900084fffff)
  kernel stack overflow (page fault): 0000 [#1] SMP
  ...

The NMI hit in the entry code right after setting up the stack pointer
from 'cpu_current_top_of_stack', so the kernel stack was empty.  The
'guess' version of __unwind_start() attempted to dereference the "top of
stack" pointer, which is not actually *on* the stack.

Add a check in the guess unwinder to deal with an empty stack.  (The
frame pointer unwinder already has such a check.)

Fixes: 7c7900f89770 ("x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations")
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c
index 9298993..2d721e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c
@@ -47,7 +47,14 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 	get_stack_info(first_frame, state->task, &state->stack_info,
 		       &state->stack_mask);
 
-	if (!__kernel_text_address(*first_frame))
+	/*
+	 * The caller can provide the address of the first frame directly
+	 * (first_frame) or indirectly (regs->sp) to indicate which stack frame
+	 * to start unwinding at.  Skip ahead until we reach it.
+	 */
+	if (!unwind_done(state) &&
+	    (!on_stack(&state->stack_info, first_frame, sizeof(long)) ||
+	    !__kernel_text_address(*first_frame)))
 		unwind_next_frame(state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__unwind_start);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ