linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 RESEND] xenbus: prefer list_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <580E3EF502000078001191FC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:03:49 -0600
From:   "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:     <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "Juergen Gross" <JGross@...e.com>
Cc:     <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 RESEND] xenbus: prefer list_for_each()

This is more efficient than list_for_each_safe() when list modification
is accompanied by breaking out of the loop.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
v2: Avoid commit message to continue from subject.
---
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- 4.9-rc2/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
+++ 4.9-rc2-xenbus-dev-list_for_each/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out:
 
 static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
 {
-	struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
+	struct watch_adapter *watch;
 	char *path, *token;
 	int err, rc;
 	LIST_HEAD(staging_q);
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned m
 		}
 		list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
 	} else {
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) {
+		list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
 			if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
 			    !strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) {
 				unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch);