linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3446653.W8FbGAKSeQ@wuerfel>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:04:31 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        adobriyan@...il.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM

On Thursday, October 20, 2016 3:08:14 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:00 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of this.
> > 
> >    +extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >    +extern void mmiocpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
> >    +
> >     #ifndef __ARMBE__
> >     static inline void memset_io(volatile void __iomem *dst, unsigned c,
> >            size_t count)
> >     {
> >    -       extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >            mmioset((void __force *)dst, c, count);
> >     }
> > 
> > The reason they're declared _within_ memset_io() is to prevent people
> > from using them by hiding their declaration.  Moving them outside is
> > an open invitation to stupid people starting to use them as an "oh it
> > must be an official API".
> > 

I've split out that change from the other ones now, and will follow
up with the patch to address all the other ones first.

> Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding
> them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not
> beautiful, but still better than armksyms.c before Al's patches (or
> at least no worse).

I'm trying this one, and an alternative patch that moves the
export into arch/arm/kernel/io.h. Let's see if we can agree
on one of these.

	Arnd