linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2]tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:07:23 +0000
From:   "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@...el.com>
To:     "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support
 Knights Mill (KNM)

On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 23:06 +0200, Piotr Luc wrote:
> This patchset is rebased onto
> 08328814256d888634ff15ba8fb67e2ae4340b64. 
> 
> First patch improves code style by replacing raw numbers
> of CPUID with descriptive macros of processor names.
> 
> The second patch adds Knights Mill (KNM) to the list of CPUIDs
> supported
> by turbostat.
> 
> Both patches come in new versions where trailing comments, which 
> described CPUs, are removed because self-descriptive macros are 
> used instead raw numbers.
> 
> Piotr Luc (2):
>   tools/power turbostat: Use Intel family processor macros
>   tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill
> (KNM)
> 
>  tools/power/x86/turbostat/Makefile    |   3 +-
>  tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++----
> ------------
>  2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
> 

Hi

I wonder if you could share with me what I need to do more to make the
patchset be accepted?

Regards,
Piotr