[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1477326057-24080-34-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:20:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 33/37] perf bench futex: Cache align the worker struct
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
It popped up in perf testing that the worker consumes some amount of
CPU. It boils down to the increment of `ops` which causes cache line
bouncing between the individual threads.
This patch aligns the struct by 256 bytes to ensure that not a cache
line is shared among CPUs. 128 byte is the x86 worst case and grep says
that L1_CACHE_SHIFT is set to 8 on s390.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161016190803.3392-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c b/tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c
index 8024cd5febd2..d9e5e80bb4d0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c
@@ -39,12 +39,15 @@ static unsigned int threads_starting;
static struct stats throughput_stats;
static pthread_cond_t thread_parent, thread_worker;
+#define SMP_CACHE_BYTES 256
+#define __cacheline_aligned __attribute__ ((aligned (SMP_CACHE_BYTES)))
+
struct worker {
int tid;
u_int32_t *futex;
pthread_t thread;
unsigned long ops;
-};
+} __cacheline_aligned;
static const struct option options[] = {
OPT_UINTEGER('t', "threads", &nthreads, "Specify amount of threads"),
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists