[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fb06d82-13aa-555b-72fc-06e670f9fd28@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:48:40 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
ravikanth.nalla@....com, linux@...nbow-software.org,
timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
agross@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, wim@....tudelft.nl,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize
function"
On 10/21/2016 12:13 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Wait a minute, I still have a question here: what about other ACPI
>> > arches (ia64, arm64)? Don't they need to call acpi_penalize_sci_irq()
>> > somewhere?
>> >
> ACPI ARM64 architecture implements reduced ACPI profile which doesn't
> have GED object.
I actually wanted to mean that ARM64 architecture doesn't have *GPE* object
implemented on ACPI reduced profile.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists