[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024164043.GS3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:40:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] workqueue: ignore dead tasks in a workqueue sleep
hook
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 06:08:14PM +0200, Roman Pen wrote:
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -875,9 +875,31 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
> */
> struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> - struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task), *to_wakeup = NULL;
> + struct worker *worker, *to_wakeup = NULL;
> struct worker_pool *pool;
>
> +
> + if (task->state == TASK_DEAD)
> + /* Here we try to catch the following path before
> + * accessing NULL kthread->vfork_done ptr thru
> + * kthread_data():
> + *
> + * oops_end()
> + * do_exit()
> + * schedule()
> + *
> + * If panic_on_oops is not set and oops happens on
> + * a workqueue execution path, thread will be killed.
> + * That is definitly sad, but not to make the situation
> + * even worse we have to ignore dead tasks in order not
> + * to step on zeroed out members (e.g. t->vfork_done is
> + * already NULL on that path, since we were called by
> + * do_exit())).
> + */
> + return NULL;
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com
Also, that misses { }.
> +
> + worker = kthread_data(task);
> +
> /*
> * Rescuers, which may not have all the fields set up like normal
> * workers, also reach here, let's not access anything before
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists