linux-kernel - [RFC] da850: DDR2/mDDR memory controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1477327596-16060-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:46:35 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-drm <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: [RFC] da850: DDR2/mDDR memory controller driver

This is a follow-up for the series[1] adding new bus and memory drivers
to better support the TI LCD controller on the da850-lcdk board.

The general consensus of the discussion that followed was that DT is
not the right tool for this kind of SoC performance tweaks.

In order to avoid committing to stable DT bindings, we only introduce
two common properties (compatible and reg) while the configuration
register values are hard-coded for each board (currently only lcdk).

I'm sending a single patch this time as RFC to get some reviews and
see it the approach is viewed as correct.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/17/613

Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
  ARM: memory: da8xx-ddrctl: new driver

 .../memory-controllers/ti-da8xx-ddrctl.txt         |  20 +++
 drivers/memory/Kconfig                             |   8 +
 drivers/memory/Makefile                            |   1 +
 drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c                      | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 216 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti-da8xx-ddrctl.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c

-- 
2.9.3