lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:55:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
Subject: Re: Disabling an interrupt in the handler locks the system up

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Mason wrote:
> 
> For the record, setting the IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for this device
> makes the system lock-up disappear.

The way how lazy irq disabling works is:

1) Interrupt is marked disabled in software, but the hardware is not masked

2) If the interrupt fires befor the interrupt is reenabled, then it's
   masked at the hardware level in the low level interrupt flow handler.

I have no idea why that does not work on your hardware. You might
instrument handle_level_irq() to see what effect that has.

Thanks,

	tglx




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ